NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon 680M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
720 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon 680M
+3613%
3.379 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 300M
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.758 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.379 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Rembrandt
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
13.1 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
