NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 384SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 384SP
+1165%
1.152 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 300M
Generation
Renoir
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.304 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1152 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Renoir
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
9.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
156 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
