CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
720 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition
0.091 TFLOPS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
+1757%
1.69 TFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition
VS
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Sep 2020
GeForce 300M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.379 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.690 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
422.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Tiger Lake GT2
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
-
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Iris Graphics 540
2
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
3
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7340 IGP
4
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel UHD Graphics 24EU Mobile
5
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 8310G IGP
6
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
7
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon HD 7540D IGP
8
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel HD Graphics 630
9
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs Intel UHD Graphics G4
10
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4270 IGP
Related News
1
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
2
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
3
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
4
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
5
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
6
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
7
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
8
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
9
Intel Unveils Three New Xeon 6 Processors
10
AMD Officially Launches the Zen5 Series Threadripper
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy