Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
8 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 320M Mac Edition +127%
0.091 TFLOPS
Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP
0.04 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Mar 2008
GeForce 300M
Generation
Radeon IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
40
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

23W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

C89
GPU Name
RS780
MCP89
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
-
-
-
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy