NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Tegra 2 GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M Mac Edition and 0System Shared VRAM Tegra 2 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 320M Mac Edition 's Advantages
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tegra 2 GPU 's Advantages
Boost Clock400MHz
Lower TDP (20W vs 23W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 300M
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
23W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
C89
GPU Name
Tegra 2
MCP89
GPU Variant
T20MGS-SHP-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
VLIW Vec4
-
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
Unknown
100 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
ES 2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
-
