Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs Intel Arc A750

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs Intel Arc A750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
Arc A750 +17100%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2011
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 500
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
898 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.37GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy