Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 510 OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (25W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.37GB/s)
168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 510 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +436%
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2011
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 500
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
898 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
14.37GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
27
48
Shading Units
216
8
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
182W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy