Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 6200 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 6200 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 6200 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 8.800GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2004
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 6 PCIe
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
275 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.800GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
2
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

600.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
1.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

NV43
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
110 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.146 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
154 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy