Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 820M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 820M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 28.83GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 820M
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +1678%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 800M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1250 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
901 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
28.83GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
384
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

6.480 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
25.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
25.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy