Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon Pro W5300M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 85W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5300M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1250MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5300M +342%
3.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 800M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.00 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.400 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.200 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XLM
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy