Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD FirePro W4170M

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD FirePro W4170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (941MHz vs 900MHz)
AMD FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M +4%
0.723 TFLOPS
FirePro W4170M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2015
GeForce 800M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Opal
-
-
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy