NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 114% (2010MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+1608%
12.35 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 800M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
850 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK208
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
