Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8300 GS and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8300 GS
0.015 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive +22600%
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Nov 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
14.69 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
375W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy