Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8300 GS and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8300 GS
0.015 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +21833%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1792
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
14.69 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
190W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy