CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 41W)
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.48GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
Score
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
VS
Radeon X1600 PRO AGP
Graphics Card
Apr 2007
Release Date
Oct 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV530
-
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Board Design
40W
TDP
41W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
Floppy
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
3.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7570
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7790
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy