NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+12850%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
333 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
14
8
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.268 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.268 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
TU117
G98-400-U2
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
