CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.67GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
+615%
0.143 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
VS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
8
Shading Units
120
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV630
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
2
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 7730
3
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
4
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 Mac Edition
5
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI Radeon HD 5970
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs ATI FireGL V7700
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon 550X
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy