Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
232 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295 +2880%
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
30
8
Shading Units
240
4
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GT200B
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy