Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 8670 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8670 OEM +3930%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jan 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
384
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Oland
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy