Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG +61350%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Vega 10
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy