Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +110000%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 21
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy