Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (825.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II +70350%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1574 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
806 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
825.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
475W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Vega 20
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy