Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1499MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
0.02 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT +38275%
7.675 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
2.080 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
19.68 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Navi 10
8400GS-225-B1
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy