Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs Intel Arc Pro A50

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A50 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
Intel Arc Pro A50 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A50 +22819%
4.813 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1024
4
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy