Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand +12442%
2.634 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Aug 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1344
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.44 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
109.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.634 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
109.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
170W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-325-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy