CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
+19690%
4.156 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400
VS
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Sep 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
8
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-301-B1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
2
NVIDIA NVS 810 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
6
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs NVIDIA NVS 300
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs ATI FirePro V8700
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy