Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
19448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X +389042%
81.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Oct 2024
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
19456
4
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
153 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy