Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 vs AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 335W)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2310MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 6950 XT +112519%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
May 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1860 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2310 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
295.7 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
739.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.31 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1478 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
335W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 KXTX (215-121000289)
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy