NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG
+13115%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2007
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
92.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
47W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
Vega 10
G84-303-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
