Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +11459%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
24.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
92.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

47W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Vega 10
G84-303-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy