Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
More VRAM (320GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.36GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320 +442%
0.228 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
20
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

143W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
RV610
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy