Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1147MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210 +5053%
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jan 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
555 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
80
96
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
20
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GV100
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy