Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro S7150

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
More VRAM (8GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150 +1552%
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Feb 2016
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Tonga
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
5 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy