Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +1149%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
14
96
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
90W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
TU106
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy