Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 250W)
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.68GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4850 X2 +338%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
995 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
63.68GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
800
24
TMUs
40
20
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
R700
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy