Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 450W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
16288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 +36119%
82.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
128
96
Shading Units
16384
24
TMUs
512
20
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
450W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
AD102
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy