Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
3488 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +4614%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
320bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
3584
24
TMUs
224
20
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
230W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Vega 10
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
90 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy