Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
18080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +39838%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 8
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
142
96
Shading Units
18176
24
TMUs
568
20
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
80 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
AD102
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy