CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 512 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 's Advantages
Lower TDP (135W vs 150W)
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 52.48GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
0.416 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
+188%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 512
VS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Dec 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
820 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
52.48GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
128
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
41.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
416.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
RV770
G92-400-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 XT Mac (215-0669080)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
135W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
5
Intel Arc A780 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
7
AMD Radeon HD 6790 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs AMD Radeon R5 220 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 vs AMD Radeon HD 6870
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy