CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690
+1063%
3.13 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
GeForce GTX 690
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
May 2012
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
1536
28
TMUs
128
20
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK104
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
3
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
6
AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
7
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon Pro VII
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Related News
1
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
2
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
3
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
5
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
6
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
7
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
8
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
9
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy