CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
+660%
2.046 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
1152
28
TMUs
96
20
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK104
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
3
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
6
AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
7
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FireStream 9350
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
Related News
1
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
2
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
3
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
5
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
6
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
7
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
8
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
9
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy