CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
AMD Radeon HD 6950
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 6950 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6950
+737%
2.253 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
Radeon HD 6950
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2010
GeForce 8
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
22
112
Shading Units
1408
28
TMUs
88
20
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.253 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
563.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
Cayman
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO (215-0807019)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
200W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
3
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
4
AMD Radeon HD 7870 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
6
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
7
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon X1650
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy