NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+18540%
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2019
GeForce 9M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
24
8
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
TU116
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
