NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 25W)
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 9200M GS
0.022 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
+11418%
2.534 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2020
GeForce 9M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
2.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
22.40 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
13W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
DG1
NB9M-GE
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
Unknown
86 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
