Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD FirePro W4190M

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (993MHz vs 900MHz)
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M +36%
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 900M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

965 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

16W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
Opal
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy