Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs ATI Radeon E2400

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock993MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (16W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 920MX +958%
0.508 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 900M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

965 MHz
Base Clock
-
993 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.944 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
23.83 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
508.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
15.89 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

16W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
RV610
N16V-GMR1-S
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy