Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +11164%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 9
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy