Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +1004%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 9
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
105W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G96C
GPU Name
RV670
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
121 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy