Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (9.600GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 128GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (19W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250 +258%
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 9
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
80
8
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
Cedar
-
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy