Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 9400 GT
0.029 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +36968%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 9
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

128MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.836 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
3.672 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
29.38 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
230W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
80 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy